My latest documentary is not for the faint-hearted. Not that it’s brimming with dirty words, but instead reveals some of the nastiest dealings by our ruling class. This expose goes far beyond the shooting in Aurora, so that the viewer can see the event for what it is more clearly.

In Chapter One – The Problem, I attempt to explain the environment that has led to the Aurora shooting and the massive wall of secrecy and authority that stands to prevent our understanding of the event or prosecution of the perpetrators.

In Chapter Two – Staged Events, I draw parallels between the theater shooting and other “Staged Events” including Joe Stack, Oklahoma Bombing, Underwear Bomber, Stephen Ivens Affair, 9/11, D.C. Sniper and Arizona Shooting. None of these event profiles should be considered authoritative or complete, but all provide a unique insight to newly awakening researchers and veteran independent researchers alike.

In Chapter Three – The Aurora Event, I walk the viewer through the fabricated account of events and focus attention on the conflicting and ill-fitting evidence.

INTRODUCTION

The summer of 2012 has been punctuated by another politically convenient mass shooting. Just to remind some readers already down the road, this time the enemy they call “terrorism” struck a movie theater in Aurora Colorado. If you haven’t seen a photo of the current winner of America’s Top Terrorist, then welcome back and congratulations on your conquest of Everest! For the benefit of those with short attention spans, it was super convenient that the “killer” is always sporting orange dyed hair the shade of which may have been achieved with a lot of Kool-Aid packets.

WHO DID THIS AND WHY

For those who suffer horrible bowel contractions, a swelling of the pride and whos tongues become vile when exposed to Conspiracy Theories, I advise you to stop reading here. And, I don’t recommend a career in the judiciary, as a PI or investigator of any kind.

I strongly suspect that James Holmes is not only NOT the shooter, but not involved in these crimes in any way. That’s the reason for my short video P.S.A. The urgency of the situation compelled me to take an interest almost immediately. However, in observing how law enforcement and the media have operated since I became both enraged and saddened. I’ll explain more of why I think Holmes is innocent further on.

THIS IS WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE WHEN ROBOTS CRY

I guess my dream of a world where a newscaster details an upsetting event with honest, solemn respect and professionalism is beyond the scope of our society. But, seeing the media odometer turn over to “Lock Step Deception and Cover” was a big deal for me. This was the first big news story where I could clearly see either total parroting of the authoritative storyline or obvious avoidance of where the case was progressing toward. Combine this with the slickness of our modern TV press and shameful print news. This is what it sounds like, when robots cry.

Just watch John Miller in this misleading clip as he both implies an ingenious and laborious investigation is taking place, and imprints more misleading evidence implicating Holmes. As you watch, pay close attention to John’s careful phrasing. Understand that almost nothing he is showing or speaking about relates in any way to this case. It’s all nonsense invented in his mind.
Investigators go high-tech to gather Aurora evidence (What I describe takes place in the first 2 minutes, luckily)

After seeing that segment, do you get the impression that investigators in this case are using the crime scene modeling software we’ve been shown? This was, no doubt John’s intent. A visit to the software companies web site reveals an interesting press release that clears things up. It states that it was actually John Miller that contacted them about recreating the theater scene. Not for investigation purposes, but for dramatic effect.

WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON HERE?

Given the context of these events, namely the history of the United States and what we’ve come to understand about more recent terror attacks it is unwise to accept the authoritative narrative. Maybe my use of “authoritative” here will be seen as twisting their words, as no conclusions or historical record of events has been compiled as of yet. But, what of all the evidence and facts in the case presented in the first days proceeding the event? Has anybody arrived at an official count of how many times Police Chief Dan Oates states with certainty that Holmes acted alone? What about the Mother’s invented statement to the investigators that, “James is who you’re looking for”, to paraphrase? That was found to be just media shenanigans.

The context I’m getting at are the methods shown to be used consistently in false-flag attacks. Most significant is that the total core of the event is a lie. Next, you’ll find the media looking the other way in every event and to the point of ridiculousness. See, they’ll get ya with the deniability game every time! In the world today, it is not patriotic to notice when our supreme overlords play dumb. They really think you need help if they see you peeking when they’re playing dumb at very convenient times.

Another odd theme consistent in these staged events is the “Simultaneous Training Drill” or similar anomaly. It’s page one of the play book used by criminals who commit these terrorizing events. This acts as a bit of predictive programming, but mostly causes confusion and difficulty in accounting for what happened, due to all the overlapping similarities. Of course, 9/11 holds the record for most simultaneous drills and exercises involving hijacking planes and flying them into the WTC. Next most notorious would be the 7/7 Bombings where they were drilling for terrorist bombings at the exact locations where the bombings occurred. So, as I’m probably being obvious Aurora was no exception.

Earlier in the day, just a short distance from Aurora, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine was unaware they had been performing their part in this drama. This time, it was a school providing this service by conducting a disaster response drill with over 150 participants. One scenario involved responding to a shooting in a theater.

SUSPECTS YOU MAY NOT BE FAMILIAR WITH

I’m simplifying the list of conveniently positioned parties to just 3, not that we don’t have evidence of other suspicious persons including James Holmes. But these 3 are obviously part of this story and we can easily speculate as to a possible motive in each case.

Chief Dan Oates – This guy has an unusual background for a cop, to put it plainly. First, he’s a reporter for a newspaper. Then, he gets an interest in becoming a cop and works his way up to commanding officer in Brooklyn, where he oversaw over 3000 employees. My guess is, becoming a cop was not the whole story and his involvement with parallel forces began very early. It ties in well that we achieved steady promotion. Although I couldn’t confirm the exact department or scope, I think he them became the head of intelligence for the NYPD. This put him in place to oversee heavy security events and presidential security. Getting a little more interesting. After 21 years in NY, he takes the job as police chief in Ann Arbor Michigan. Not too much later, in 2005 he winds up as what I thought was his current position as police chief in Aurora.

Simple enough. However, what’s unusual is that somewhere in all of this Mr. Oates receives multiple law degrees. In fact, he’s currently licensed to practice law in New York and Colorado. Wikipedia states he is “currently teaching an online course in constitutional law at Long Island University.” I thought he was the chief of….ah whatever. The bottom line is that, often times the bad guys in our institutional power structure are given a pass, waved on as it were. Sometimes, as I have to suspect in the case of George W. Bush they aren’t even required to pass the bar. That’s right. GWB is a lawyer. GWB therefore must have passed the bar. GWB doesn’t have the intellect sufficient to pass the bar. Therefore, GWB was given a pass to pass the bar. It’s simple process of elimination.

Philip Anschutz – Not too long before this event, in 2005 or thereabouts Anschutz became majority owner of the largest theater chain through acquisition of 3 large chains. Coincidentally, the Century 16 theater where the shooting is said to have occurred isn’t one of his, but owned by his competitor Cinemark. Why is this interesting at all? It’s the school that links these elements. On the grounds of the University of Colorado stands a modern research and medical facility named after Philip Anschutz, the Anschutz Medical Campus. You can start to form connections here that create a number of possible motives for Mr. Anschutz.

The Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado –
I’m still working to present something for this suspect.

TO THOSE IMPACTED BY THESE EVENTS

My position on the guilt or innocence of James Holmes is not so firmly held that I’m either oblivious to the distress and otherwise unfortunate effects this has caused people. I’m not one to wish death or harm of any kind on a person.

If, however after reading this you think I’m being disrespectful or that I’m a horrible person for somehow garnering attention from all of this, think carefully about this. Image that I wrote a thriller that contained a near match to the events that occured in Aurora. Except in my storyline, James is not one of the killers and is actually a patsy chosen for his easy-going nature and reliability. The planned event required a fall guy and as circumstances would reveal, James was easily befriened and muscled by some fellow students who were actually operatives of a parallel government agency that conducts these exercises for very selfish reasons.

Pretty good publishing potential? Now, just imagine that the part about James being a patsy was real. If true, would I be unjustified in doing what I could to know what the truth was? That is my intent, and that is all. I do not seek for even the murderers to be punished. Just the subtle effect that public disclosure would have. In other words, let’s not be duped again for these are only minor tragedies along the pathway to doom if all is not as it seems.

LINKS TO FURTHER INFORMATION

Rather than provide you with an obligatory overview of the crime and the proceedings to date, I’ll instead link to a couple sources that I recommend to bring you up to speed.

This first link is simply a Google search for “Aurora Shooting”, which for the next couple months at least will be packed with main-stream media distractions, misleading evidence, emotional stories of every-day heroics, obfuscations and unedited press releases. And they’ve got some lies in there too.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Aurora+Shooting&hl=en

Next, is what I believe to be the single site having achieved Aurora Shooting Coniseur status. You won’t find a blow-by-blow of the game by John Madden. What you will find are serious articles on this topic, in muck-raking fashion. Worthy articles aside, it’s the very revealing comment threads that earn this site Seven Thumbs Up.
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/category/aurora-massacre/

The theater shooting incident that occurred a short time ago has given rise to countless questions. In this short video, I will focus on evidence found at the theater where the shooting is said to have occurred. Specifically, the blood evidence at the rear of the theater.

Is it not obvious to you that I am inviting overwhelming criticism by making this statement? Why is that? Do you feel that you would be committing a moral crime if you were to make the same statement? Why is that?

What is a Semite Anyway?

Before you decide to respond to this post, I strongly suggest you first read a few definitions of the word “Semite.” I won’t bother to link to any here, as none seem to be or even claim to be authoritative. Why is that? It appears that use of the term was first in the late 19th century. Some definitions claim a Hebrew origin tied to “Shem,” one of the 3 sons of Noah. In those cases, the term is used to define a language type including Arabic, Aramaic, Amheric, Assyrian, Akkadian, Ethiopic, Hebrew and Phoenician. Other definitions define it as the peoples of southwest Asia, including Hebrews and Arabs amongst many others.

In my opinion, the use of the term “anti-Semite” is almost always erroneous or at the very least misguided. However, for the sake of communication and clarity I chose to use the term as it is more commonly thought to mean “anti-Jewish.” Why is that? That’s right. I’m anti-Jewish! Well, not all Jews; just most Jews who identify as Jewish. But, the peoples I am most opposed to are Zionists. I will explain further on.

I should add that, my last name is Klein. This isn’t an attempt to trick the reader into thinking that I myself am Jewish. I am not, although some extended members of my family are. But, it does raise the issue of the so-called “self-hating Jew.” Yes, there is a theory among many Jews that certain Jews have a deep, yet misguided hatred of themselves, presumably related to their Jewish identity. It’s unclear whether they are referring to an ethnic or religious identity.

Flavors of anti-Semitism

It’s amazing to me that, of all the flavors of anti-Semitism that have been invented I can’t determine which best fits my attitude. Over the years since long before World War II, Jews have identified dozens of varieties of anti-Semitism, including religious anti-Semitism, Christian anti-Semitism, anti-Christian anti-Semitism, pagan anti-Semitism, economic anti-Semitism, social anti-Semitism, racial anti-Semitism, black anti-Semitism, pathological anti-Semitism, eternal anti-Semitism, political anti-Semitism, Jewish anti-Semitism, literary anti-Semitism, xenophobic anti-Semitism and zoological anti-Semitism to name some of the more prominent forms.

Most of the specific flavors outlined above were born out of academia and right here in the US. In most cases, the reasoning behind the differentiation is relatively sound and based on some empirical data. In others, the explanation given is overtly racist, based in delusional thinking or an undue sense of self-worth. This is just the beginnings of the voluminous wealth of material devoted to the subject.

I’ve claimed to be specifically anti-Jewish and then identified Jewish identity and Zionism as the focus of my opposition. What other Jewish oriented causes might I take issue with? Well, the Holocaust story and belief some Jews hold that they are “God’s chosen people” are two that leap to mind. These 2 matters loom hugely over all Jewish people, whether they invite this reality or not. For those Jews that have both taken issue with Holocaust claims and don’t necessarily believe they constitute God’s chosen people, I congratulate thee and exclude you from my horrible anti-Semitism. My criticism isn’t blind and I am opposed to racism.

The Holocaust Story

A few years ago, I experienced a slow awakening to certain historical crimes involving conspiracy and propaganda employed to disguise or excuse those crimes . In nearly all cases, the historical record appears to have been massaged to avoid any correlation with reality. Holocaust revisionism wasn’t too far along this path of awakening, I suspect because the Holocaust is such a well marketed story and viewed by most to be a taboo subject.

At first, I was fighting a subconscious force that was implanted to deny the truth and I didn’t see what was right in front of me. I attempted to substantiate claims of only tiny holes in the accepted history. In so doing, I dismissed the possibility that the Holocaust story was almost entirely fabricated. This is the moment when most readers will give in to their programming and begin to close the mind for fear of how others will view them. In truth, 99% of you will perceive this information through a reality mostly pieced together by propaganda. Don’t believe me? Of course you don’t. But, I don’t expect you to.

So, as planned I’m going to make a few points that I suspect are more likely truths relating to the Holocaust and WWII and encourage you to research them for yourself. Look for evidence to substantiate them, not refute them as there’s no shortage of misinformation created for the exact purpose of concealing the truth.

1. Gas Chambers claimed to have been used for the killing of Jews during WWII simply did not exist.
2. The number, 6,000,000 given as the total number of Jews killed by the Germans during WWII is an outrageous exaggeration.
3. General Patton himself was a Holocaust revisionist.
4. Millions of Jews followed the Russian Army into Germany, demanding to occupy German cities and be given the homes of German citizens.
5. Jewish groups now claim that all the “death camps” were in Poland and the camps in Germany were simply prisoner of war camps. This did little to reduce their claim of 6,000,000 killed.
6. No American got within 400 miles of a so-called “death camp” and claims of Americans liberating them are all lies.
7. The 20 Million Russians said to have been killed by Germany were actually killed by Stalin and falsely attributed to Germany.
8. Auschwitz included a theater, swimming pool and small orchestra for use by and made up of prisoners.
9. Prisoners at German camps were tattooed with numbers intended for ongoing tracking of prisoners, which makes little sense if they were just going to be exterminated.

I’ll leave it there, as any one of these possibilities is more than enough reason to cause a critical mind to question other parts of the accepted history. Admittedly, the entire WWII farce was perpetrated by psychopathic minds not at all limited to Jews. In fact, it’s these psychopaths that I find most dangerous, be they Jewish or not. But this post is about my antisemitism, so I will continue to focus on this phenomenon.

God’s Chosen People

As for the claims that Jews are “God’s chosen people,” I don’t intent to argue that scriptures don’t contain this assertion. I strongly suspect that the origin of this concept is almost entirely derived from the authoritative religious texts; the Old Testament, the Talmud, etc. Being non-religious myself, I don’t subscribe to the notion and consider it either false or allegorical. To be clear, I don’t look at this claim as being any different from other religious claims. I find most of them to be invented by man through the ages, misinterpretation or otherwise allegorical by design.

Why, then do I have a problem with the Jewish claim of being “God’s chosen people?” If it isn’t obvious to you upon first hearing the claim, what do you think the claim does to the status of the remaining peoples of the world? Allow me to save you the time of deeply considering this question. I suspect that belief in this claim has caused Jews to consider non-Jews to be less than equal (Racism?). Putting aside the issue of Judaism being a religion and not a race and putting aside other Jewish religious tenants that go much further to subjugate non-Jews, I suspect Jews have caused nothing but trouble when practicing the belief.

Within the peoples that identify as Jewish, there are many that seek to dominate and rule the world. Of this, it is hard to refute even in the face of your American programming. Whether suddenly or over many years, this seems to have come to pass. You have only to look at the profile of the typical executive body or governmental body in America. I suspect that, despite their claims to the contrary almost none of these people practice Judaism. The worst of these people identify as members of the Jewish RACE, not RELIGION. Big difference. Many openly admit to being Zionists while dismissively describing Zionism as a harmless desire for a Jewish homeland. It is this subset of Jews that likely first cried out “anti-Semite!” In so doing, they created a most clever trap for their opponents. For you see, if you question the motives of a Jew you are labeled. If you question the label, you are labeled.

Even more rational and well-respected Jews seem to share the belief that “anti-Semitism” is a special mental disorder that compels the actions of all non-Jews. This irrational, yet fully accepted loop of reason has allowed Jews for many decades now to avoid questioning their own actions. After all, the criticism always comes from an “anti-Semite.”

Try it. Do you oppose the political agenda of Israel or have even a minor criticism? Voice your disagreement and you too will see how the trap is total. Don’t let this revelation stop you from speaking the truth. That’s why these traps were set in the first place. As a result, the Jewish lobby in America isn’t some effective outside force but arguably the largest force “inside” the US government.

Why Should I Not be an anti-Semite?

I encourage all who self-identify by race or religion as Jewish to denounce Jewish lies and skullduggery, even if I’m a fool and they exist only in my mind. That’s my position for the moment. However, as I stated in the title of this post I invite the reader to help me understand why I should not be an anti-Semite. Now that I have made clear the specific claims and actions of Jews I oppose, I hope you can provide evidence to cause me to change my mind.

Do I, in fact suffer from a deeply held or even genetic predisposition to anti-Semitism causing me to have these impressions? Are Jews actually undeserving of these criticisms and being persecuted for conspiracy where no conspiracy actually exists (a much more preferable reality)? Please don’t limit your response to identifying me as an anti-Semite, as I’ve clearly admitted that.

This is, without doubt the most challenging post I’ve undertaken. In this single article I will be exposing myself to the criticism of my peers and family, risking the reputation of my blog http://tyrannynews.com, and exposing myself to forces that systematically interfere with the freedom of individuals and sometimes their very lives.

To summarize this staggeringly complicated story is futile, but I will attempt to do so. The true nature of our civilization, the purported history contained in the accepted texts, the worlds financial systems, the medical institutions and the current institutions of government is a deception.

Over the years, through a combination of fate, circumstance, secrecy, intent and human nature a self-perpetuating authority was created that is cloaked in a multitude of myths, misunderstandings, false conceptions and assumptions. In my opinion, it’s unlikely that any one person short of God knows the true extent of this system.

It’s clear to some that a major component of this system is a cabal operating within our current financial institutions. It is this possibility, I suspect that led one researcher to entitle his most significant work, “FINANCIAL TYRANNY: Defeating the Greatest Cover-Up of All Time.”

The bulk of this article contains the transcription of an over 3 hours long phone conversation between the author of the aforementioned work, David Wilcock and a person going by the alias “Drake”, who claims to be involved in an operation to simply arrest the perpetrators of this massive conspiracy. But before you read the transcription, I strongly advise you to read David’s pivotal work.

I am providing links to the individual sections below. I believe it to be an unparalleled accounting of the disparate pieces of this amazing puzzle including more substantiating evidence than has ever been compiled in one place.

FINANCIAL TYRANNY: Defeating the Greatest Cover-Up of All Time

I suggest, as you read what I am linking to below that you maintain a healthy measure of skepticism while shelving your disbelief as much as possible. Nothing is held back here. Some information will seem at first to be incomprehensible. Other information will cause some of you to subconsciously employ cognitive dissonance. Some of what you read will be most disheartening, while other parts will stir within you the excitement you last experienced as a child.

In any case, read this for what it’s worth.

Section One: Defeating the Greatest Cover-Up of All Time
Section Two: The History
Section Three: The Real World
Section Four: The Occult Economy
Section Five: Bretton Woods and the BIS
Section Six: The Ultimate Ponzi Scheme

MASS ARRESTS: David Interviews Drake (Transcription)

YouTube audio of David’s interview of Drake

INTRODUCTION: THE PLAN FOR MASS ARRESTS

DAVID WILCOCK (DW): Hello. This is David Wilcock. You're listening to a Divine Cosmos audio blog. Today's date is, let's see … the 28th of March. It's a Wednesday. It's 6

p.m., Pacific Daylight Time.

I'm here with a remarkable new whistleblower who has just come forward. His name is Drake. That's what he's going by.

I contacted him because I have been covering this story about pending mass arrests.

You have to understand the scope of what we're talking about here. We're not talking about 10 people, 20 people.

We're talking about a systematic, potentially world-wide effort — although most of these conspirators are in the G5 countries, so I've heard.

[The G5 countries are the US, UK, Germany, Italy, France.]

This is a very wide-spread effort to effectively give us, as a planet, a massive dose of antibiotics — against an infection that has been threatening to almost completely destroy its host.

The host would be the Earth and its people; the animals, the plants, the trees and everything.

DAVID DIDN’T GET IT AT FIRST

DW: Drake came along on the Internet recently. I was sent an email by him, announcing that he was going to have some radio shows.

But, when the email first passed by my desk, I didn't quite catch the impact of what it was saying.

Up until now, the only people who have really been reporting on these pending mass arrests whatsoever have been Benjamin Fulford and myself.

In both cases, we have, together and independently, sets of contacts, some of which are deeply embedded within the Pentagon, who have reported to us that this is VERY REAL.

In fact, I had heard from an off-the-books source — this is not somebody who's gone public at all — that this had been sparked by 9/11, to a large degree.

Many people in the military realized that they were not in the chain of need-to-know.

This was not Arabs with box cutters that caused these buildings to fall into their own footprint.

If that could happen — if kerosene can melt steel — then every kerosene heater ever built is a massive hazard; but yet they're all sitting there just fine.

SOMETHING IS GOING ON HERE

DW: Something is going on here. People know about it. They're scared of it.

And, in what I call the Sheep Effect, they feel that if they keep their head down, then the wolf won't know that he's been spotted.

The sheep who's dumb enough to look up and stare the wolf in the eye is going to make him charge. That's the one who ends up dying.

I'm not afraid of death. Neither is Drake.

He's here, and he has put a public face behind something that, up until now, has sounded like two guys stroking their egos — trying to say something that makes everybody feel good, but has no teeth behind it.

[to Drake] And now, here you are. I want to hear what you have to say.

Why don't you tell us a little about yourself and how you got into all this? [Sound of an elephant roar]

Most Americans remember but would probably rather keep it as a distant and fading memory. Some, on the other hand are compelled to vigilantly pursue justice for the victims…and not just those who suffered directly but all the people who suffered a psychic attack and an ongoing paradigm misalignment. Many of my fellow American’s are debilitated still. The attack I’m referring to occurred in 1995 at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal building.

The official story remains that, a Ryder rental truck loaded with fertilizer and fuel explosives was parked in front of the building by Timothy McVeigh. Then, the truck exploded causing the entire front of the building to collapse. The subsequent rescue, manhunt and criminal investigation was thorough and yada, yada, yada. That’s as far as I’ll go play acting that this story is remotely true.

Sure, I agree that the evidence is overwhelming that the building collapsed and that people died. I can even agree with the theory that an actual Ryder truck was blown up that morning. All other official accounts are simply lies or extreme distortions. Sadly, government enacted terror attacks like this involve many separate crimes that ramp up to the event and descend well past it. These crimes typically involve misconduct, failure of duty and always involve assassination. It’s logical to assume crimes like these are required to cover up such nasty operations.

Photo courtesy of Visibility 9-11

But, this story isn’t about the scandalous murder of Kenneth Trentadue. Jesse realized, as many of us have that the whole OKC mess was an obvious conspiracy. So he expanded his efforts to include exposing the truth behind the terror attack itself. And that brings us to the current events that relate to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by Jesse with the FBI. In his FOIA filing with the FBI, Jesse requests building surveillance video on the morning of the attack as well as dash-cam video recorded of Timothy McVeigh when he was stopped by a State Trooper shortly after the attack.

It was Jesse who, in September 2009 received from the FBI 20 videos relevant to the attacks. However, none of them actually include the few minutes before and during the attack itself. The claim made by the FBI at that time was that the tapes had all been stopped so that the tapes could be changed. What does your gut tell you about this response?

This time, Jesse was suing the FBI for not having made a good faith effort to respond to the request. Thankfully, after 6 years having passed since his initial request a Federal judge is refusing to grant the FBIs motion to dismiss the case and supports Jesse’s assertions.

This is Good News! A Rarity for OKC Researchers

Even half-hearted actions to force the governments hand are extremely rare. Before I direct you to the details of the case reported by Desert News, consider this. It’s clear that Jesse Trentadue has faced and continues to face enormous challenges. He lost a brother in a senseless and little-known branch of the OKC attack. Moved by the desire to awaken the sleeping masses who fail to see the importance in uncovering the truth of these matters, Jesse forges on.

FBI explanation of missing Oklahoma City bombing tapes not credible, judge says

In an April 10th press release issued by the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC), Sibel Edmonds describes how the FBI has delayed clearing her new book Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story for 341 days. To accord with the law, they had just 30 days to have done so.

In the course of her team’s investigation into these matters, she uncovered evidence that the FBI requires their employees to sign a contract agreeing to allow the FBI to censor the employee. What this does, in effect is remove any opportunity the employee would have had to blow the whistle on corruption, illegal activity or anything else the FBI deems to be an issue of “Public Policy.”

Here’s a quote directly from Sibel’s copy of this contract…

I understand that unauthorized disclosure of information in the files of the FBI or information I may acquire AS a Language Services Contractor could result in impairment of national security, place human life in jeopardy, or result in denial of due process to a person or persons who are subjects of an FBI investigation, or prevent the FBI from effectively discharging its responsibilities. I understand the need for this secrecy agreement; therefore, I agree that I w111 never divulge, publish or reveal either by word or conduct, or by other means of disclosure, to any unauthorized recipient without official written authorization by the Director of the FBI or his delegate, any information from the investigatory files of the FBI or any information relating to material contained in the files, or disclose any information or produce any material acquired as a part of the performance of my contract or because of my contractor status. The burden is on me to determine, prior to disclosure, whether information may be disclosed and in that regard I agree to request approval of Director of the FBI in each instance by presenting the full text of my proposed disclosure in writing to the Director of the FBI at least thirty (30) days prior to disclosure. I understand that his agreement is not intended to apply to information which has been placed in the public domain or to prevent me from writing or speaking about the FBI, it is intended to prevent disclosure of information where disclosure would be contrary to the law, regulation or public policy. I agree the Director of the FBI is in a better position than I to make that determination. (Emphasis, mine)

I love that last line.

Investigation Shows Agency Used Contract to Censor Whistleblowers

Press Release at Boiling Frogs Post…

Washington, D.C. April 10, 2012. Today, the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) revealed that the FBI required employees to sign employment contracts that are illegal under Federal law. The NWC launched the investigation in response to a nearly yearlong campaign by the FBI to prevent the publication of whistleblower Sibel Edmonds’ new book, Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story.

On April 26, 2011, Ms. Edmonds followed official procedure and submitted her manuscript to the FBI for pre-publication clearance. Under the terms of her employment agreement and controlling regulations, the FBI was required to review and approve the submission within thirty (30) days. Instead of complying with the law, the FBI intentionally stalled the approval process for over 341 days and has still refused to “clear” the book for publication.

…

The NWC is also releasing documentation confirming that the FBI required employees, including Ms. Edmonds, to sign the illegal contracts that allowed the FBI to censor issues of “public policy” it found embarrassing. According to Ms. Edmonds attorney, Stephen M. Kohn, “the controlling law strictly limits government’s ability to censor its employees. Agencies like the FBI may require pre-publication review of its employees’ writings, but may only censor classified or secret information. The government may not censor books or other writings on ‘policy’ grounds. The FBI’s employment contract with Ms. Edmonds is overreaching and illegal.”

Additional documents demonstrate that the agency acted illegally to prevent Ms. Edmonds from publishing a manuscript that might embarrass the agency.

PR2The book in question, Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story, discusses Ms. Edmonds’s experience as an FBI Language Specialist who discovered and blew the whistle on serious security breaches and cover-ups at the Washington Field Office. The FBI fired Ms. Edmonds for making protected disclosures about the misconduct she observed and later invoked the “state’s secret” privilege to suppress her story.

An independent investigation by the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General confirmed her allegations and the illegality of her termination. However, the Bush administration invoked the state secrets privilege in 2002 in order to have Ms. Edmonds’ whistleblower claims dismissed and to protect the government from embarrassment.

In recognition of her work to expose intelligence failures, Ms. Edmonds received the 2006 First Amendment Award, presented by the PEN American Center and Newman’s Own.

PR3Stephen M. Kohn, Executive Director of the National Whistleblowers Center, also stated:

The FBI must stop harassing Sibel Edmonds. The law is crystal clear on the government’s ability to censor federal employees and contractors. When reviewing their writings, the government has the single ability to strike classified or secret information. The government may not censor a book based on “policy.” Here, the FBI has invented new powers for itself, violating the Constitution. Congress should investigate all employment agreements drafted by the FBI to ensure that they are legal and not designed to censor speech protected under the First Amendment.

The office of Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden issues an opinion stating that Delaware sheriffs and their deputies “shall not have any arrest authority.” The opinion was issued by State Solicitor Lawrence Lewis on February 23, 2012.

Just to clarify, Joseph Robinette “Beau” Biden III is the eldest son of Vice President Joe Biden. I’ll admit that I’m not that familiar with Beau and not so familiar with his father, for that matter. What I am familiar with is the evidence that the corporate United States is constantly undertaking to assume and usurp all authority in America.

To quote Wikipedia,

In the United States, a sheriff is generally, but not always, the highest law enforcement officer of a county.

It appears to me that changes to Wikipedia’s information for the topic “Sheriff” has been in great flux since early February. My instinct leads me to consider these changes might have been attempts to re-define the term and frame Sheriffs as having less authority by definition. But, my experience has shown me that TPTB don’t often have enough concern about backlash or intelligent citizen journalism to go to such extraneous efforts.

The recent controversy over the issue began when Kent County Sheriff Norman Wood inquired with the Attorney General’s office as to his authority and that of other Sheriffs to arrest. This triggered the opinion issued by State Solicitor Lawrence Lewis. Subsequently, legislation was introduced by State Representative Daniel B. Short and Senator Gary Simpson that would explicitly prohibit the three Delaware county sheriffs and deputies from exercising arrest powers.

In an effort to clear up some misinformation about the bill, Republican Rep. Dan Short asked that House Bill 290 not be heard before the House Administration Committee last week as previously scheduled. That effectively tabled the bill for a time. This was likely done partly in recognition that a dozen Sussex county residents were rallying in opposition to the bill outside the courthouse.

The bottom line is that, the issue of the Sheriff’s authority (not just arrest authority) is contentious because it stands directly in the way of Federal authority. For instance, when a federal agency seeks to conduct operations like setting up a sting operation in a community they tend to encounter no resistance what-so-ever. How could local cops, the Mayor or Councilman stand in opposition to the FBI? They probably couldn’t. That makes sense so long as you don’t understand the Sheriff’s usual authority in situations like these.

What about the question, who has the authority to arrest a Sheriff? Oddly, in many communities only the Coroner has that authority. Why that is, I can’t say. But it points to just how little most of us know about “just who is in control here?”

Ultimately, issues like these are sometimes dealt with in the courts. The Supreme Court of many states have often times ruled in favor of the Sheriff’s authority. One problem though, is that these court records are often sealed and therefor aren’t searchable in any database and don’t get considered in future cases. What I think is a larger issue, is that Sheriff’s looking for precedent that might encourage them to act in accordance with their true authority will find little to help them.

Are US Courts Constitutional or Administrative Law Courts?

To speed things along, you should know that I firmly suspect that the entirety of what we know today as the “Federal Government” is actually a facade. One that was put in place as a corporate entity. All laws in America are now known as “statutes.” This makes sense considering that the purpose of courts in America today is to enforce the will of and perpetuate a criminal cabal, to punish those that would oppose them and to strip the money from the unwitting participants in this horrible scam. Understanding this as the background for my opinions is probably helpful.

The United States Code and the more recently adopted Universal Commercial Code have been employed as the “law” of the land in America. This, in combination with certain Supreme Court rulings have stripped Congress of its powers and massively expanded the power of administrative bodies. So much so that, in the case of many US agencies the powers now exist to pass laws, enforce the law that it passes, and then judge whether its own actions and the actions of other parties comply with those same laws. So, separation of powers doesn’t really exist in America.

James Madison is partly quoting Thomas Jefferson as he states…

The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.

Why all of this matters is that it all points to the underlying truth about America today. That being, America is not even a true reflection of what it was or was intended to be. More importantly, what the average American believes about America is patently false and the result of lies taught by an education system and media deeply involved in the scam. My hope is that the existing authority of Sheriffs isn’t stripped further as it will only help America to descend further into despotism and tyranny.

“We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is. It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon.
– Robert Hemphill, Credit Manager – Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

There is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, so criminally deceptive, so violent, born in sin, unfathomable though it may be. And now you are burdened by the guilt of knowing.

The previous paragraph is a very short collage of statements made by a few men who dared to help others understand the truth about America. Burdened, but freeing themselves of the guilt.

I reprint the following in its entirety, as required by the author.

Do You Know Where You REALLY Live?

And Under What Conditions?
by Fred Marshall Jr. April 7, 2007

PREFACE:

“When an honestly mistaken man comes face-to-face with the truth, then he must either cease being mistaken or stop being honest.” – origin unknown

The reason “ignorance is bliss” is such a legitimate adage is that once you know something, you cannot “un-know” it. Once you learn something, you cannot “un-learn” it. Once you become aware that something wrong or evil is afoot, your choices are limited to taking corrective action, looking the other way, or simply refusing to believe what you’ve been shown, even in the face of overwhelming factual evidence.

If you choose to look the other way, the guilt of knowing….and living with your choice to do nothing….is very painful. That you were “better off” before you knew gnaws at your conscience, so you have to re¬make the choice every day until you either muster the courage to take corrective action, or lose your own self-respect by acknowledging your cowardice. If your choice is simply not to believe, then your remaining ignorant is deliberate and, some would say, inexcusable. “I’m just one person, what can I do?” is not the answer.

Should you choose to take whatever corrective action is within your means, the usual first step is to inform and enlighten others in order to accumulate strength in numbers through group advocacy. But all too often you encounter opposition, even ridicule, from the “blissfully ignorant” who refuse to believe and choose to remain ignorant. These are the ones who will deride you the hardest.

Many of us still harbor the now old-fashioned belief that if you see someone steal from your neighbor, you ought to tell him. With that and the above in mind, duty and honor compel me to at least attempt to inform as many people as I can reach as to the nature of the reality in which we Americans live today. Many will scoff and call me names. While that may well boost their false sense of imagined superiority, it will not alter reality.

What if you were to wake up tomorrow and learn that most everything you had thought was true was a deception….a deception formed by people who stood to profit from your ignorance? Not just in one or two small areas but virtually every facet of your existence. Would you want to know? Or, would you be content with the life you had before you discovered the truth?

“If there is to be trouble, let it be in my day so that my child can have peace.” – Thomas Paine

There are four kinds of people:
He who knows not, and knows not that he knows not;
He who knows not, and knows that he knows not;
He who knows, but knows not that he knows; and
He who knows, and knows that he knows.

Fasten your seatbelts. The following ride will tug at everything you’ve always thought you knew, and have long taken for granted. Things are anything but what they seem. But there is hope and there are solutions.

“We have it in our power to begin the world over again.” – Thomas Paine

Where to start? The extensive research I have conducted since 1992 reveals an accumulation of shocking facts too overwhelming to even attempt to dump in one pile, in one place, at one time. I’ll try to give only a summarized overview here. Because much will be foreign to most readers, and most will read with a high degree of skepticism, I have interspersed verifiable quotes, by historic figures, throughout the text to buttress the credibility of the shocking revelations contained herein. The first one discloses the bottom line at the outset:

“This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial Banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the Banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is. It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon.” – Robert Hemphill, Credit Manager of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Georgia

Let’s begin with the Money Panic of 1907.

“History records that the money-changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance”. – James Madison

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a money aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks, and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.” – Thomas Jefferson, 3rd US President (1801-1809)

In 1906, the Stock Market reached its highest peak ever. But in March, 1907, and again in October, the market fell by more than 50% and precipitated runs on banks, and inevitable bank closings followed. The Money Panic of 1907, as it was called, was engineered by Jacob Schiff and the Rockefellers, to gain control of some corporations they wanted to own. Their manipulation of the market crippled the corporations and they bought them up in distress sales.

They created the money panic so they could increase their holdings immediately, and push for “banking reform” that would allow the banking cartel, that they were in the process of assembling, to take control of the United States.

The financial instability they created was intended to help them usher legislation through that amounted to an elaborate scheme to enslave the American people by duping them into forever paying a tax on their incomes to the cartel, while mistakenly believing they were paying it to the government.

The first attempt, in 1908, was called the “Aldrich Bill,” introduced by Nelson Aldrich, a Senator who had married John D. Rockefeller’s daughter, and it went down in flames in the Republican Congress. Moreover, President Taft had vowed to veto the bill if it should pass.

Keeping that title at a readable length was most challenging. Talk about a complex storyline. Despite my sincere effort to title this post so that it gets across the main points, it only hints at the many parts of this cryptic tale. In slightly more detail, the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston has published a children’s educational comic and teacher’s guide containing people and places that seem to obfuscate the real elements they represent. Not whimsical characters in a make-believe land, but modern day power brokers involved in a power struggle to return the world to a Gold Standard. Whew.

The notion that the Fed has any interest in locking itself into a Gold Standard is ridiculous. Duly noted. But, after reading about most of this bizarre theory I have to suspect that it’s true. Alan Greenspan and others in the public and private sectors appear to have been working since 1981 to this end, if the comic’s encrypted version of history is to be believed. This presents more than the problem of my view of recent events being way off base. This is more like the shock in seeing a close friend peel their face off to reveal Ryan Seacrest underneath. This is a situational inversion.

Greenspan May Be One of the Good Guys After All

Despite being open to the existence of conspiracies, this one was very hard to dig in to.

How can all these characters and events seemingly meant to teach young people the concept of scarcity, actually reveal a secret plan to take back control of the world’s currency markets?

Not even vaguely familiar with monetary policy in the Ford/Reagan era, nor being aware of Alan Greenspan’s back story. I had come to an opinion of Greenspan based only on publicly available information that fell in my lap this past 20 years. What I’ve heard him say and the perceived connection to our current financial decline led me to disapprove of the man. However, the kiddie book has me reconsidering.

First, Greenspan was a close childhood friend of John Kemeny who invented the BASIC computing language. Greenspan was also an “early adapter” in the early days of computing. He wrote economic modeling programs early enough to have been punch-card based. “rootA” was a key programming concept in financial computing, partly invented by Greenspan. “Roota” is the comic’s main character.

This is Where it Gets Good

That probably doesn’t as yet turn your world upside down. Stay with me. This is where it gets good. Certainly by the time Greenspan was grooming to chair the Fed, his mentor Arthur Burns would have shared with him his belief that a secretive banking power had been controlling the world for centuries. As the Road to Roota theory goes, Greenspan and others of like mind are likely to have at least pondered the use of Greenspan’s market management software to destroy this banking cabal. It’s fairly well known that the software was easily capable of overriding the true markets if that was the intent.

Not just manipulation of monetary system, but gold, silver, energy, derivatives, oil and stocks. The 1981 time-frame was experiencing an explosive fusion between new banking software, the Reagan Gold Commission effort to return to a gold standard and the desire by every rat on the row to rig markets. Coincidentally (or not) this was the year Greenspan became Chairman.

But, if we recast the elements in Wishes & Rainbows it describes how the bad elements within banking and finance who had ruled previously managed to alter these management programs to their advantage. This led to the FIAT currencies and market rigging nightmare that continues to this day. So, in return Greenspan and his group determined that the only way to win was to play into their greed and drive the world’s currencies to ZERO!

That sounds frightful, I know. And, I admit that the idea our trusted leaders were openly engaged in this currency destruction pissed me off. But, I hadn’t been able to see how this could be our salvation. Might the end result put an end to Globalism? Might it kill funding of overseas troops? Might it be the only workable solution?

I will leave you with the legend below, that will help you quickly grasp the alternate identities this theory postulates. Links to both editions of the comic and to the Website where I sourced most of my research are below as well. If you’ve come this far, then by all means continue and return here to share what you’ve learned.

Wishes & Rainbows – 1981 Edition (PDF)
Wishes & Rainbows – 2007 Edition (PDF)
Road to Roota – A Teacher’s Guide for Wishes & Rainbows (PDF)

The Road to Roota Theory Website

The following article is re-printed in its entirety with permission of the author. I was, however unable to find the author’s official web site, as the site indicated in the article (proparanoid.com) is no longer accessible. But, you can get the author’s book The Professional Paranoid as I’m about to at Amazon. You’ll find a review of the book by Catherine Austin Fitts, who praised it.

H. Michael Sweeney
Copyright (c) 1997, 2000 All rights reserved
(Revised April 2000)
 
 

1 Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.

Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2 Become incredulous and indignant.

Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used to show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the ‘How dare you!’ gambit.

3 Create rumor mongers.

Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such ‘arguable rumors’. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a ‘wild rumor’ from a ‘bunch of kids on the Internet’ which can have no basis in fact.

4 Use a straw man.

Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5 Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.

This is also known as the primary ‘attack the messenger’ ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as ‘kooks’, ‘right-wing’, ‘liberal’, ‘left-wing’, ‘terrorists’, ‘conspiracy buffs’, ‘radicals’, ‘militia’, ‘racists’, ‘religious fanatics’, ‘sexual deviates’, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6 Hit and Run.

In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain critical reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7 Question motives.

Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8 Invoke authority.

Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough ‘jargon’ and ‘minutia’ to illustrate you are ‘one who knows’, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9 Play Dumb.

No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10 Associate opponent charges with old news.

A derivative of the straw man — usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with – a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11 Establish and rely upon fall-back positions.

Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the ‘high road’ and ‘confess’ with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, ‘just aren’t so.’ Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly ‘call for an end to the nonsense’ because you have already ‘done the right thing.’ Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for ‘coming clean’ and ‘owning up’ to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12 Enigmas have no solution.

Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13 Alice in Wonderland Logic.

Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.

14 Demand complete solutions.

Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.

15 Fit the facts to alternate conclusions.

This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16 Vanish evidence and witnesses.

If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17 Change the subject.

Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can ‘argue’ with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18 Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents.

If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how ‘sensitive they are to criticism.’

19 Ignore facts presented, demand impossible proofs.

This is perhaps a variant of the ‘play dumb’ rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20 False evidence.

Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations — as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21 Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body.

Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.

22 Manufacture a new truth.

Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23 Create bigger distractions.

If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24 Silence critics.

If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.

25 Vanish.

If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

1 Avoidance

They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.

2 Selectivity

They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.

3 Coincidental

They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.

4 Teamwork

They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.

5 Anti-conspiratorial

They almost always have disdain for ‘conspiracy theorists’ and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain. Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.

6 Artificial Emotions

An odd kind of ‘artificial’ emotionalism and an unusually thick skin — an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal.

But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the ‘image’ and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It’s just a job, and they often seem unable to ‘act their role in character’ as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation.

You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later — an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game — where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.

7 Inconsistent

There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat ‘freudian’, so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within.

I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I’m not aware of too many Navy pilots who don’t have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.

8 Time Constant

There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:

ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT – FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.

When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR – there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to ‘get permission’ or instruction from a formal chain of command.

In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay – the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.

Remarkably, even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game.

This video is a rough draft that was cut short and not fully produced, as I couldn’t devote further time to it. It does, however get you to a point where I would have been left to speculate anyway. Take it from where I leave off and see what you can find.

What Usama bin Laden May Have Looked Like as Tim Osman

Most people are aware of the connections between George H. W. Bush and the bin Laden family, that they were close family friends and that pappa Bush even stayed as a guest of the bin Ladens on a few trips to Saudi Arabia. If this is all new to you, then you might want to splash some cold water in your face and get ready to get real. Most of what I’ll be writing about here is well-documented knowledge if not to the general public, certainly within the intelligence and geopolitical communities.

The Afghan Soviet Conflict

In the late 1970s, the United States engaged in covert funding of Afghan insurgents who fought with a faction of Afghans that sought to topple the ruling power of Afghanistan and repel invading Soviet forces. To make a very long story short, this group of insurgents took control of Afghanistan and eventually discouraged the Soviet Union from further egress.

As this fighting raged through the late 1970s into the mid 1980s, many volunteer fighters joined forces with the native Afghan forces. Most were Muslim and many were Arab. One volunteer of note was a wealthy Saudi by the name of Usama bin Laden. He contributed millions of his own and others to the effort. Numerous reports from the time and more recently indicate that bin Laden was working with the CIA or at minimum bought weapons from the CIA.

What may surprise even those informed of the general US/Afghanistan matters is that bin Laden may have been in direct communication with US officials right up until September 11, 2001. A short time after 9/11, FBI translator Sibel Edmonds was silenced by a slew of gag orders when she began telling her story about the connections to bin Laden, the Taliban and even Al-Qaeda. The FBI had previously fired her for reporting communications intercepts that indicated these connections.

Enter Tim Osman

To corroborate a number of accounts involving an alias being used for bin Laden, an intelligence cable surfaced that I can’t verify the authenticity of. None the less, the cable includes very authentic details from what my research has revealed.

Intelligence Cable with Details of bin Laden in America

In the above cable, it describes a visit to the Department of State Afghan Desk by two gentlemen named, Tim Osman and Ralph Olberg. The cable later, additionally identifies Osman as being “USAMA/OSAMA BIN LADEN/OBL.” It’s also noted in hand-writing located in the margin “A & OBL room in Hilton Hotel Sherman Oaks?” This is posed as a question, but it leaves little doubt that the possibility existed that bin Laden was an overnight visitor in the US. What’s not easily derived from the cable is that this visit is reported to have been sometime in July, 2001, roughly 2 months before the 9/11 events.

The Many Faces of Osama Bin Laden

The person, the legend, the bogey-man known to the world as Osama bin Laden was almost certainly tailored to suit. For instance, when bin Laden delivered a letter to the press shortly after 9/11 offering his condolences and denying any connection to the event whatsoever, the US press ignored it. When it was followed up, a week or two later with a video in which bin Laden again denied having anything to do with 9/11, the US media aired it with incorrect translation or edited versions that omitted bin Laden’s denial. That video has since been stricken from the Internet, based on my many years of searching for it.

A short time after bin Laden’s letter and video, a video was said to have been recovered by US forces in an Afghanistan residence that contained footage of bin Laden and his Lieutenants. In this video, a healthy looking, squatter, more jovial than usual bin Laden with much less grey hair makes statements that implicate himself in the 9/11 events and praises the individuals involved. Some members of the independent media cried fowl almost instantly with cries that the video was clearly a fake. But, their cries were silenced. Opposition to the video and audio messages purported to be of bin Laden that emerged since that time has diminished more and more, as the message became clear nobody wanted to hear it. It seemed at the time and still does in my opinion that the American public doesn’t want to learn of the possibility that their impression of bin Laden may be partly based on fabrication.

One interesting psy-op that I can’t begin to figure out involves an age-progressed image said to have been created to aid in the search for bin Laden. On January 14, 2010 the State Department issued a press release showing their “expert” effort to digitally update bin Laden’s image to create an image of what he might look like today.

State Department's Age-Progressed bin Laden Image Blunder

Only 2 days later, Gaspar Llamazares, a member of the Spanish parliament alerted the Spanish press that the State Department’s updated image of bin Laden was nothing more than his own head-shot with altered eyes. Gaspar later said,

It might provoke mirth, but it demonstrates that what we’re seeing from security services isn’t exactly recommendable.

What Usama bin Laden May Have Looked Like as Tim Osman

The various attempts to portray bin Laden using actors or digital photographic techniques have been embarrassingly shoddy. You may have seen the image a trickster produced depicting bin Laden after being killed by US forces, although I wouldn’t put it past US intelligence to have been the source. It too was immediately deemed a fraud. Are they ratcheting up the ridiculousness to see just how gullible the American public really is? Certainly the forces at work here employ experts easily capable of producing top-notch forgeries. One can only guess.

I suspect that bin Laden lived in the US for months or maybe even years while working as an intelligence asset. Assuming for a moment that he did, it wouldn’t have been practical to present himself in a long beard and traditional Saudi attire. He would have likely been shaven and in typical American attire. In no way do I consider myself an expert digital or graphic artist. I’m very familiar with Photoshop and have a fundamental understanding of design. With only those skills and less than 3 hours, I produced the following.

What Usama bin Laden May Have Looked Like as Tim Osman

In my opinion, the above illustrates just how easy it would have been for bin Laden to travel without fear and without appearing suspicious in the US even after the 9/11 events. But, my composite image is meant to show what he may have looked like in the years before 9/11.

Did he live in the San Diego area, as some have reported? If so, would you have been suspicious of the man shown above if you had been in line behind him at the super-market? Does this alternate image cause you to reconsider your impressions of the terrorist, the myth, the legend, the man?

On January 8th 2011 the media reported a massacre had taken place in Arizona. Over a dozen people had been shot, many of whom were said to have died. Three victims of note include Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, Federal Judge John Roll and Christina Taylor Green who was born on 9/11/2001. One suspect had been captured, but another was said to still be at large. This was later “corrected” as being a false lead. Many other false or conflicting elements of the story were later corrected or simply left unanswered.

A photo of Jared Lee Loughner, the subject captured at the scene of the shooting was released by the Pima County Sheriff’s Department on Monday afternoon. The photo was taken Saturday by the Pima County Sheriff’s Department Forensic Unit, said Deputy Erin Gibson, a spokeswoman for the department. It is not a mug shot, she said.

Loughner Mugshot Original and Altered Version Released to the Press

On January 20th, the Pima County Sheriff’s Department issued a press release stating… “Until further notice, due to a controversy between the Sheriff’s Department and the County Attorney’s office, no further information reference the Jan. 8, 2011 shooting will be released.” According to KGUN9-TV in Tucson, the announcement resulted in the cancellation of a CNN interview with Sheriff Bureau Chief Richard Kastigar about the security videos which captured the attack on film. The interview had been scheduled to commence 45 minutes later in the KGUN9-TV newsroom.

Glaring Problems with Authenticity of First Photo

Setting aside entirely the issue of not being presented with an official mugshot with height markings and other identifying data, the photo that was released seemed to some to be right out of central casting. A more sinister and maniacal photo of an accused killer could hardly be imagined.

Credit should be given to starvosan, who posted at prisonplanet.com on February 12th 2011…

There was a lot of speculation that the one post-shooting photo of Loughner that was released was also altered somehow to make Loughner look more sinister. I wonder if the Loughner mugshot is not being released because it looks totally different than the one that we have seen.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=201093.msg1197290#msg1197290

As early as February 22nd 2011, a commenter on a thread relating to the mug shot identified that the photo released to the press showed the left eye (subject’s right eye) contained double pupils.

As usual, the disinformation agents, paid bloggers and useful idiots were out in droves and clearly gained the upper hand in the debate. One tactic that seemed to dominate the discussions of these two photos was the straw-man argument. For example, if one person posts a comment that identifies all the differences between the photos the next commenter will question why the first person can’t see that they are obviously the same person. The debate is shifted to whether the two photos depict the same person, despite the first commenter not arguing on either side of that question at all. After a few posts follow to clutter the thread, the subtle misdirection goes unchallenged.

Of course, AT NO TIME DID THE MAIN-STREAM MEDIA EVEN HINT THAT THE PHOTO WAS FABRICATED OR EVEN MISREPRESENTED.

On February 21st 2011, U.S. District Judge Larry A. Burns authorized the release of the official mug shots saying that the two mug shots are “tamer” than the Pima County Sheriff’s Department photo of Loughner that has been widely disseminated and would not likely affect Loughner’s right to a fair trial. Subsequently, the US Marshals Service released the updated photo.

Best Practice Recommendation for Mug Shot Consistency

To ensure mugshot consistency, over a number of years NIST developed a Best Practice Recommendation with guidelines for various photographic aspects, including…

• Types of Poses
• Depth of Field
• Centering
• Lighting
• Background
• Exposure
• Aspect Ratio
• Minimum Number of Pixels
• Color Space
• Pixel Aspect Ratio
• Compression Algorithm
• File Format

As a result of my research into this photographic deception, once again I uncovered suspicious evidence and connections almost too numerous to imagine. That is, if you imagine the shooting happened in any way remotely similar to the story being reported by big media and trusted law enforcement bodies. I will, almost certainly revisit this topic with an article on the shooting itself, the amazing evidence uncovered and the almost cartoonish cast of characters involved. Until I do, I leave you with one notably ridiculous fact that should begin to open your eyes to this massive fraud.

Congresswoman Giffords’ YouTube account was subscribed to by at least 202 people. She, on the other hand had only subscribed to 2 YouTube accounts. As one might expect, she had subscribed to fellow Congressman Ike Skelton’s account. Not so easy to fathom was her only other YouTube subscription, to the account of her reported shooter Jared Lee Loughner.

Sometimes I feel disoriented and lack perspective about my intelligence, my perception. Although I can’t claim to have ever accurately measured a person’s intelligence, I like to think I’m capable of sizing people up. But that may be an exaggeration. Maybe I estimate that someone is smart because they think as I do or have everyone else believing it.

Maybe there was someone out there who knew 9/11 was a deception. Someone totally disconnected from matters of that kind, yet instantly knowing. Someone who knew that the scary stuff people saw on their TVs was a walk in the park compared to the bad and unreported stuff going down.

If you’re someone who didn’t catch on to the 9/11 shenanigans or the concerted cover-up in the aftermath, then we have something in common. I don’t think my conscious mind formed the suspicions until 2007. Yes, I admit that it took 6 years before I was able to detect all the 9/11 lies and funny-business I had been blasted with since America was “Under Attack.” Even then, the pieces only began to assemble. And the only information at my disposal to help form new ideas about the whole affair was mostly disinformation. It was like trying to make an official record of history with only thousands of torn pages from poorly written romance novels.

Whatever the hell had kept me blind during all those years, I may never know. I’m still unclear whether I was an idiot at the time. If so, then simply having a paradigm shift over 9/11 wouldn’t itself have elevated me to the status of genius. Meaning that, I may still be an idiot.

When did you first have a clear problem with the 9/11 narrative? In 2007, as I did? 2005? Were you savvy enough to start questioning in 2004?

Don’t tell me you knew it was all wrong as early as 2002! Well, if so I would be proud of your uncommonly hawk-like vision. You saw through much of the world’s best and expertly crafted deceptions. A renegade, while everyone else panicked at the mere thought of “Freedom Fries” you were 3 steps ahead and on the run from “False-Flag Fries.”

If, however you weren’t so swift to see the problems underpinning 9/11 then prepare yourself. Prepare for the shocking possibility that you were and may still be an idiot.

I give you, ARMAGEDDON by artist Ben Frost.

The earliest copyright date for the following image is OCTOBER 2001!

Take a moment to let that set in. Seriously, if you consider what the world was like in the weeks post 9/11 you are likely to develop an appreciation for this artistic achievement. For the initiated, the overall impression resulting from the image only comes to the viewer through subtle connections to simple elements contained within. For those oblivious to the secret forces driving parts of the world around us, the image might even be disregarded as nothing more than illustration for a children’s book. I can’t image the process that took place for the artist to become comfortable enough to make all of the clear and nebulous suggestions contained herein. To help us both understand Ben Frost, I quote the opening entry in Wikipedia for the artist.

Ben Frost (born Brisbane, Australia) is a visual artist whose work seeks to challenge contemporary norms and values of Western culture and society. Frost’s visual work places common iconic images from advertising, entertainment, and politics into startling juxtapositions that are often confrontational and controversial.

Artist Frost currently lives and works in Sydney and exhibits locally and internationally.

Maybe living in Australia at the time was the key to being immune to the 9/11 hypnotic effect. Assuming that Australian media and social events were not targeted with the specific messaging required for 9/11 to succeed, it’s possible Ben didn’t experience the proper conditions that existed in the US. Or, maybe it’s more like susceptibility to hypnosis. I was deemed by a hypnotist at age 13 to be of low susceptibility to hypnosis. So, it isn’t likely preconditioning accounts for the 6 year lag for me to see what Ben saw right away.

Hopefully it’s not too late, and you haven’t yet begun postulating impossibly complicated messages hidden within Ben’s image. After reading through a lengthy thread at Above Top Secret, where I discovered this item I sure glazed over! So, let’s stop here. But, don’t click off without first seeing my image analysis below.

Analysis of Suggestive Image

Suggested Sources on this Topic

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread809545
http://usahitman.com/toy-ad-911/
http://benfrostisdead.com

This article is in reference to the following study…

Article: Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories.
Authors: Wood, M., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M.
Subject of Study: Social Psychological and Personality Science.
Funding By: School of Psychology, University of Kent

A 2011 study by students at the School of Psychology – Keynes College, University of Kent begins with the premise that belief in a given conspiracy theory increases the likelihood of belief in another. This has been shown to be statistically true in many previous studies. However, these authors wanted to learn whether these beliefs remained even when the theories were mutually exclusive. Despite some elements of the study being less than optimal, I didn’t find many false or misleading statements and thought the work was generally good. Although, the most revealing conclusion contained in the study was probably not intended to be thought of as such by the authors.

What was more revealing to me than the conclusions of the study itself was this statement, elaborating on their conclusions…

Almost any account of events which accords with the broader beliefs in question is likely to garner some endorsement by adherents of a conspiracist worldview.

Does that sound like the analysis of someone who has at least some suspicions that run counter to traditional views of an event? I doubt it! I question whether the point of this study was really to reach the conclusion that it did. Maybe the authors were confident in the stupidity of the participants and knew that, given certain study criteria and constraints they would respond accordingly. With that data as the foundation, the authors could have set out to explain the results in a manner that supported their own “worldview.”

Academia Disregard Conspiracy Theories Except as the Subject of Research to Marginalize their Proponents

I suspect that the authors of this study share the general view in academia that, to spend ones time considering the merit of conspiracy theories is trite and utterly ridiculous. After all, universities are the birthplace and nest of nothing less than logic, reason and truth. Escaping the influence of facts and proper methodology as you are instructed and based upon which your work is judged can’t be easy. Even if ones method of conducting a study is flawless, an unconventional analysis or conclusion is certain to draw criticism from superiors having spent more time in the nest.

Not having spent much time in institutions of higher learning, I’m not limited by mandated methods in my analysis of this study. In fact, I would likely have structured it differently in the first place. To begin, I wouldn’t have allowed any vagueness in what I was asking of the participants. In reference to how the questions were presented to the participants, the authors state…

They were then asked about their opinion of the official story, followed by 3 conspiracy items.

The study employed a 7-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) to “ascertain participants’ agreement…” How would the results have differed if the options were simply True or False? This is a total setup. The instructions to the participants are to share their “opinions”, the options given are an array of 7 vague orientations none of which corresponds to the truth, and claim the resulting responses are good indicators of agreement with the conflicting theories as presented.

Would it surprise you then to learn that, the resulting conclusions are then said to reflect the participants’ “beliefs?” If that were a legitimate statement, wouldn’t the scale of options at least have been something like (1 = “strongly disbelieve“, 7 = “strongly believe“)?

I concede that nearly all of the statements presented by the authors as underlying causes for conspiracy theorist tendencies are very likely true for a subset of their population. One area where I think the conclusions fail is in their assumption that the participants knew that their answers were to reflect beliefs and not suspicions. Secondly, the authors’ scope of reference research and personal views seemed clearly to lack a wide enough spectrum to account for the validity of the theories given in the first place.

Despite my hoping to find a unique view of the conspiracy theorist dynamic, sadly I have to rate this study as biased against the existence of conspiracies and therefore intentional or unintentional disinformation designed primarily to paint people with uncommon theories as unintelligent and to further shift the interest away from examination of the theories themselves.

The following article is a reprint from the blog, Fear of the Invisible and an excerpt from the Book “Fear of the Invisible by Janine Roberts.”

You may have thought, as I did that the Polio Virus had been eradicated many years ago. While doing some research online, I uncovered a statistic that each year 9 Billion people are vaccinated for Polio. Being confused that the number referring to “people” vaccinated might have actually been “dollars spent”, I investigated further and came across the following article. Here’s the short story.

1. The Government hypes an astounding achievement, the Polio Vaccine.
2. Even the President gives his thumbs-up in PSAs shown in theaters nation-wide.
3. Unfortunately, the shot gives more people Polio than recent stats show in the months prior. You see, Polio was on the swift decline based on many factors.
4. So, since the government can’t admit to such a screw-up and to cover up the screw-up it’s decided to simply change the diagnostic protocol.
5. Doctors were then instructed to diagnose all symptoms previously known to be signs of Polio as one of a few other and less controversial ailments…ailments such as Catatonic Meningitis.
6. After this intentional misdiagnosis becomes standard procedure, some creative practitioners later invent Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as a convenient label for the, now rare Polio.
7. No more Polio, the Government is our hero and everyone’s happy. Except for the thousands of people with Polio who now can’t even trust that their doctor can make a correct diagnosis.

I strongly encourage you to read this very interesting and eye-opening article.

How a Continuing Polio Epidemic is being Hidden

Written by Janine Roberts
Wednesday, 27 August 2008 13:34
excerpt from a chapter of “Fear of the Invisible”

I have been told again and again by health authorities that the polio vaccine is a marvelous lifesaver – and I had accepted this on trust. As no one I knew doubted this, I had no reason to question it. I knew however that it is easy to invent history. If a false history is repeated often enough, the chances are that people will believe it. It is simply a matter of most of us not having time to check all the facts for ourselves.

But – now I knew of the possibility that pesticides might cause polio, I had a very clear question to answer. There were no great American polio epidemics after 1956. What stopped them: the withdrawal of the pesticides – or the introduction of the vaccine?

Most modern histories of the polio vaccine say its launch went smoothly – although many mention a brief hiccup early on called the ‘Cutter Incident,’ describing this as a simple error that was quickly rectified. But what I learnt from reading contemporary newspapers and medical reports was very different.

I found the triumph and relief accompanying the launch of the Salk vaccine was extremely short-lived. A medical historian of the time, Dr. M. Beddow Baily, reported: ‘Only 13 days after the vaccine had been acclaimed by the whole of the US press and radio as one of the greatest medical discoveries of the century, and 2 days after the British ministry of health had announced it would go right ahead with the manufacture of the vaccine, came the first news of disaster. Children inoculated with one brand of the vaccine [the Cutter] had developed poliomyelitis. In the following days more and more cases were reported, some of them after inoculation with other brands.’

Within two weeks nearly 200 vaccinated children had gone down with polio. This produced near panic in the White House. It was not yet summer. Polio normally did not strike at this time. President Eisenhower had publicly endorsed this vaccine – and did not want any failures on his watch. US Health Secretary Oveta Hobby thus went to see the Surgeon General to sternly say the president needed to be spared further embarrassment!

Within days, on 8 May 1955, the Surgeon General suspended the entire US production of the vaccine and called for emergency meetings with Salk and the manufacturers. They then agreed that these cases were caused by polioviruses surviving the formaldehyde poisoning by being inside ‘lumps in the vaccine’. The manufacturers agreed to stir their vaccine better, the public were told they had no further need to worry, and the distribution of the vaccine resumed after only a five-day break.

However this was not the end of the trouble. It was now reported by the media that the vaccine still seemed to be causing a polio epidemic rather than preventing it.

In Boston during the next 4 months, more than 2,000 of the vaccinated went down with polio – yet in the previous year there were only 273 cases. The number of cases doubled in vaccinated New York State and Connecticut, and tripled in Vermont. There was a five-fold increase in polio in vaccinated Rhode Island and Wisconsin. Many children were paralyzed in the vaccine-injected arm.

In June 1955 the British doctors’ union, the Medical Practitioners’ Union reported: ‘These misfortunes would be almost endurable if a whole new generation were to be rendered permanently immune to the disease. In fact, there is no evidence that any lasting immunity is achieved [by vaccination].’ The following month Canada suspended its distribution of Salk’s vaccine. By November all European countries had suspended their distribution plans, all that is apart from Denmark

As I learnt of this, I remembered what went into this vaccine. I could not presume these cases were caused by the poliovirus in the vaccine. These children were having a host of potential toxins and viruses injected into their arms, for anything smaller than a virus could not be filtered out. Did this explain why many were paralyzed in the arm vaccinated?

The New York Times of May 11, 1956 reported the ‘Supplement No. 15 of the Poliomyelitis Surveillance Report’ for that year revealed there was 12% more paralysis in 1956 than in 1955. By January 1957 seventeen US states had stopped distributing the polio vaccine. The New York Times reported that nearly half of all polio cases reported were in vaccinated children.

Polio cases rose from 300 to 400% in the five states or cities that made the Salk vaccine compulsory by law. The following table gives their results.

From contemporary reports there were nine times more polio cases in 1957 than in 1956, and that they were more serious than ever before. In the first 8 months of 1957 the Public Health Service reported, out of a total of 3,212 polio cases, there were 1,055 cases of paralysis, or 33.5% of the total. From January 1st to August 1958 there was a total of 1,638 cases of polio, with 801 of them paralytic, or 49% of the total. This was, as far as I can discover, a far higher proportion of serious cases than had ever been recorded.

These contemporary accounts were utterly unlike what I had expected, for today the polio vaccine is said to work extremely effectively.

It is perhaps also relevant to note that the immediate profits made from the vaccine were very considerable. Wyeth’s profits went up 50% between 1955 and 1956, all on the back of the Salk vaccine. Merck’s profits went up from $16 million to $20 million. Eli Lilly nearly doubled its profits from $16 million to $30 million.

But by 1964 very few cases of polio were being reported. So, what happened after 1959 to make the polio vaccine effective?

I do not know how to express convincingly what I found when I looked into this. I avoid conspiracy theory as too many chance events are thus explained – but this does not mean that some conspiracies have not happened.

I found firm evidence that the regulatory authorities had employed from 1960 another weapon from their armoury to bring down the numbers of reported polio cases. They promulgated new regulations that rewrote the rules for polio diagnosis, effectively wiping polio nearly out of existence by simply changing the rules for polio diagnosis!

In 1956, the health authorities instructed doctors that they were in future only to diagnose polio if a patient has paralytic symptoms for 60 days or more. As polio was diagnosed previously if there were just 24 hours of paralytic symptoms, and as the disease in milder cases frequently lasted less than 60 days, this automatically meant vastly fewer cases of polio would be reported.

Furthermore, it was now decreed that all cases of polio occurring within 30 days of vaccination were to be recorded, not as possibly caused by the vaccine, but as ‘pre-existing’. This regulatory change also ensured that far fewer cases of vaccine failure would be recorded.

Another regulatory change had an even greater impact. Most polio diagnoses during the epidemics had not involved paralysis but muscular weakness and widespread pain. In many cases this was produced by inflammation of the membrane that protects the brain and spinal neuron cells. The CDC described such cases as ‘serious but rarely fatal’. But doctors were now instructed that all such cases must no longer be diagnosed as polio but as viral or aseptic meningitis! The Los Angeles County health authority explained: ‘Most cases reported prior to July 1 1958 of non-paralytic poliomyelitis are now reported as viral or aseptic meningitis’ in accordance with instructions from Washington.’

As a result, the number of cases of meningitis diagnosed went from near zero to many thousands while polio came down equivalently. Between 1951 and 1960 in the United States 70,083 cases of non-paralytic polio were diagnosed – and zero cases of aseptic meningitis. But under the new diagnostic rules this was reversed. Over the next twenty years over 100,000 cases of aseptic meningitis were diagnosed and only 589 cases of ‘non-paralytic polio’.

Extraordinarily, non-paralytic cases were now to be renamed as meningitis even if the poliovirus were present! In future, the reported figures for polio were officially to exclude ‘cases of aseptic meningitis due to poliovirus or other enteroviruses.’

These changes did not go entirely unnoticed. Dr Bernard Greenberg, then head of the Department of Biostatistics at the University of North Carolina, testified at a 1962 Congressional hearing that infantile paralysis cases had increased after the introduction of the vaccine by 50% from 1957 to 1958, and by 80% from 1958 to 1959. He concluded that US health officials had manipulated the statistics to give entirely the opposite impression.

This change was not only in the US. In Canada, the Dominion Bureau of Statistics issued in June 1959 an official bulletin entitled Poliomyelitis Trends, 1958. This noted; ‘data shown in this report are confined to paralytic poliomyelitis only. It may be noted that the Dominion Council of Health at its 74th meeting in October 1958 recommended that for the purposes of national reporting and statistics the term non-paralytic poliomyelitis be replaced by ‘meningitis, viral or aseptic,’‘ They also now allowed for other viruses to be found in polio cases, saying that these ‘ specific viruses [should be] shown where known.’ When they were found, these cases also were said not to be polio. 


Other cases previously diagnosed as polio would in future be classified as ‘cerebral palsy’, as ‘Guillain-Barre syndrome’ and even as ‘muscular dystrophy.’ Some were now called ‘Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease’, which can also cause paralysis. (And recently the Coxsackie virus was found in cases of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), which also can result in very polio-like symptoms of paralytic muscle damage.)

But this reclassification of polio cases seemingly did not satisfy the regulatory authorities. Apparently there were still too many cases of the worst kind of polio, ‘paralytic polio’ – so it was finally decided that these cases must also be removed from the polio case registry, thus eliminating nearly all the remaining cases of polio in the world – giving the vaccine a stunning and utterly fraudulent victory.

This was achieved by announcing that in future all patients with the classic polio paralytic symptoms were to be diagnosed initially as having ‘Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP)’ and thus reported to the regulatory authorities. Samples of two turds from the patient must also be sent in to them. These turds would be inspected to see if the poliovirus was in them. If not, then these cases are to be declared not polio – no matter that the children have all the classic symptoms, the distress and pain found in the worst polio cases during the great US polio epidemics.

This astonishingly revealed that the ‘poliovirus’ is rarely to be found in these paralysed children. Logically, one would think that this would force the health authorities to conclude that the virus could not be the cause of polio – but it seems they were more interested in fabricating a victory.

Thus they triumphantly declare large parts of the world polio free, even where AFP is common, and give the credit for this solely to the vaccine and its manufacturers, as well as to Sabin and Salk. I did not know how to characterize this except as an incredible act of medical fraud. I struggle to find any excuses for those involved. It begun in the 1950s but, I am afraid to say, it is still continuing.

This has had the most serious of consequences. One of these is that the power to diagnose polio has been completely taken away from ordinary doctors. Before 1958 they were taught to diagnose ‘paralytic polio’ as they did other diseases – by observing specific symptoms, particularly acute paralysis and great pain. But doctors are now instructed not to look for the poliovirus itself, as ‘the virus is very hard to find.’ Instead this task is to be left to WHO and the other governmental agencies that inspect turds. This would be comical if it were not so tragically deceptive.

Under these new rules, patients previously diagnosed with paralytic polio were re-diagnosed. When patients in Detroit, diagnosed as having paralytic polio during a 1958 epidemic, were re-tested as required by the new rule, 49% of them were found not to have poliovirus and therefore told they did not have polio.

Should it find a case in which the poliovirus is present, the vaccine will be administered on a national scale. This has happened now so many times that in populous countries like India many cases of ‘provocation’ polio occur in the arm vaccinated. ‘Unnecessary injections were associated with paralysis in the outbreak reported by Kohler et al. The WHO estimates that over 12 billion injections are given every year, and most are unnecessary. Multiple injections can increase the risk of paralysis from OPV as well as wild-type viruses.’ These cases of paralysis are caused by many types of repeated injections so are rarely called ‘poliomyelitis’

This is all extraordinary. The Detroit patients, the children with AFP today, are all ill with the same symptoms and pain as in the earlier cases of paralytic polio. Wasn’t the polio vaccine devised to prevent such cases? The new rules for polio diagnosis have thus proved to be the perfect way to hide total vaccine failure -and have thus apparently served the intentions of both the Public Health Authorities and vaccine manufacturers well. This deceit has protected them from being sued for producing a useless vaccine. The poliovirus is scientifically classified as a human virus that naturally replicates only in the human gut, so the WHO excrement inspection is surely meaningless? Its presence in excrement is natural – and finding it there does not prove that it causes paralysis in the motor neuron cells of the backbone.

When I went to look at the statistics provided by the World Health Organization, I found that Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) is now a raging, but little mentioned, epidemic in many parts of the world where pesticide use is high. Its figures for the East Asian/Pacific region reveal the number of cases of AFP between 1994 and 1998 went up by 50% in China, 400% in Malaysia, and 1,500% in the Pacific islands.

…continued in book.

• Medical World Newsletter; June 1955
• M Beddow Bayly; ‘The story of the Salk anti-poliomyelitis vaccine’; www.whale.to/vaccine/bayly.html These press reports contradict part of the otherwise excellent information presented on the Jim West’s ‘Images of Poliomyelitis’ website. He presented graphs that showed polio had been practically eliminated in the US by 1956.
• http://americandaily.com/article/15680
• The diagnostic guidelines also specified that the patient must have, ‘No history of immunisation’ if they are to be diagnosed with the illness they were vaccinated against. (‘Textbook of Infectious Diseases.’ – University of Colorado School of Medicine. 1982). In other words, if they are vaccinated against an illness, it is presumed they cannot have already had it.
• http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/revb/enterovirus/viral_meningitis.htm
• EIS Officer, Division of Immunization, Center for Disease Control, Dept of Health and Human Services, USA (personal communication to Dr Isaac Golden dated 26 August 1988).
• Walene James; http://www.vaccinetruth.org/polio_vaccines.htm
• http://www.who.int/vaccines/casecount/case_count.cfm
• Kohler KA, Hlady WG, Banerjee K, Sutter RW. Outbreak of poliomyelitis due to type 3 poliovirus, northern India, 1999-2000: injections a major contributing factor. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:272-77
• The International Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 32, 2. Pp 278-9
• http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/32/2/278

The story of how everyone has a strawman created for them at birth and how it is used to collect revenue for your government. A fun and informative animation made in the spirit of freedom. Please spread and upload with credits intact also link back to our channel if you do. Hi-res and mobile versions are available for download from our website.

While the world was returning home after celebrating the unprecedented election of a mixed-race president (at least in the US), President Barack Obama felt compelled to get right to work. By this time, a President issuing an Executive Order wasn’t exactly headline news as the Bush administration was the record-holder to date. Seemingly fearless of the fact that it might be interpreted as engaging in a contest with Bush and even more fearless of the reaction to the genre of the Order, Obama plunged ahead. The Executive Order was entitled simply, “Presidential Records.”

Allow me to clarify and stress this point. This Executive Order was signed January 21, 2009, the eve of Obama’s inauguration.

I’m quoting the entire text of the Order below and have provided a direct link to the White House website, where the content can be confirmed. To the “Birther”, who already questions Obama’s eligibility for office and for at least some who think the majority of his official history is a fable this won’t be surprising. My hope is that publishing this and calling attention to it will cause more American’s to consider the possibility of fraud. I believe that, this act clearly points to a strong interest by some in the current administration to conceal something within Obama’s past. Could it be related to his eduction? Might he have fudged on a student loan application? Or, might these documents he has sought to conceal reveal something much darker?

Here is a link to the source at WhiteHouse.gov. Here is the document, reprinted in its entirety…

You may recall seeing at least a portion of an unconventional video which featured actor Tom Cruise speaking about Scientology. From what I’ve been able to gather, it was released by investigative reporter, Mark Ebner in January of 2008 but likely originated elsewhere. His interesting website is hollywoodinterrupted.com. You can see the longest clip I could find of this video at the bottom of this article. That is, as long as YouTube isn’t instructed by Scientology to remove it. That’s been the fate of many earlier attempts to publish the video.

Having seen the video a couple years ago after already doing some research into Scientology, I reacted the way most people did and laughed at the crazy man. I still do. In retrospect, I suspect that I wasn’t able to discern some interesting lessons the video could have taught me back then. The prime take-away, at least from my perspective is that Tom has a clearly malformed and unusual, personal reality and yet he remains a wealthy, successful and respected figure. Let’s explore this further.

Still taken from infamous Tom Cruise/Scientology video

I’m betting the framework of Tom’s life is largely the result of his environment. To begin with, he’s a star with all the obligatory reclusiveness and special treatment. To this, add the enormous burden of secrecy required to protect his image if the rumors are true that he is homosexual. However, nothing he’s endured could be so blinding and disorienting than the programmed existence he’s been the center of, courtesy of Scientology. With those elements combined, one can imagine the mind giving way to an unrealistic view of the world around us.

Successful and Intelligent or Brainwashed Psychotic?

For the uninitiated, or if it were currently the mid nineties Tom Cruise would be viewed as a hunkie, clean-cut, personable, successful and sought-after actor. Most would probably assume without having much else to go on that he was intelligent and down-to-earth from his media exposure up to that time. And, if it weren’t for increased and probably unbalanced interest in his odd behavior and the wide-spread knowledge of his status as a scientologist during recent years, he would likely be viewed similarly. So, which is it? Is he a successful and intelligent actor or is he brainwashed and dysfunctional psychotic?

The reason why this phenomenon interests me is that it relates to my experiences as a so called “conspiracy theorist.” I’ve observed that, no matter the status within society, the intellect, the scientific or academic credentials, the logic of one’s arguments or any other factor, if you share that you have unconventional ideas you will be dismissed as stupid or an attention seeker.

In Tom’s case, there’s a twist in that Tom’s unusual profile does include red flags that could be seen to diminish his ideas. His adoration of Scientology alone accomplishes that. But, still he is treated and largely respected by many people as if his status is unquestionable. How is that possible, I wonder? I’ll bet that, when Tom debates the legitimacy of Scientology’s tenants he considers the other party a stupid attention-seeker.

Is the Goal of Casual Debate or Even Simple Discussion to Win?

All I can conclude at this point is that, despite even one’s own evidence of having a biased or unbalanced knowledge-base with which to form one’s ideas, the natural tendency is to promote one’s ideas with conviction. It’s as if, for most people the goal of casual debate or even simple discussion is to win. To have one’s ideas dismissed is to lose. The flip-side being that, to accept a contrary idea that forces one to change their mind is to lose. Regardless of a person’s profile, their view of themselves or their understanding of the issues the average person thinks they know the truth or at least will know it when they see it.

Do you see the problem here?

I think it’s important to read Tom’s statements without the added intonation, exuberance and body language to get a sense of just how mired in disinformation and fantasy he is. However, for the full experience you can always watch the actual Tom Cruise/Scientology video below.

Tom Cruise Scientology Video – ( Original UNCUT )